- M

http://www.youtube.com/experiencewii

But this will be brief.

I’m utterly in love with this concept http://russelldavies.typepad.com/planning/2006/11/how_to_be_inter.html

I may try some of these to keep my mind flexible.

Cheers

SomethingStore.com (not to be confused with SOMETHING DOT COM )

Okay, so this post will be a short little cop-out attempt to get myself to actually start doing this again. Even though it’s purely for myself, I think it’s a good mental exercise.

So. SomethingStore.com. If you’re at all familiar with Woot.com, and their Woot-Off, you may know of the Bandolier of Carrots. Blinged Out Cabbage. Beverage of Choice. I’m talking about their famed and elusive Bag O’ Crap. The concept being the Bag O’ Crap is simple. You pay $1 for a bag up to a maximum of three bags. What’s in the bag? Crap. You don’t know. Could be something fancy (I recall hearing about a nice stereo system). Could be as advertised (read: crap); I think the oddest one I heard was 15 bags of Texas air, which is exactly what it says it is. Woot says that you’re going to get crap; in fact, they tell you to not even bother buying it because it’s going to be crap. But the fun of it is that it’s cheap and you just never know what you’re going to get from them. When the BOC comes up in a Woot-Off, their servers crash every time with people trying to get one.

Okay, so what does that have to do with that other thing about which I was talking. SomethingStore.com. Sorta the same principal with a few key changes. Firstly, the cost for a Something is $10 apiece. Secondly, I think you can order up to 5 at a time. Thirdly, they give you things of good quality. From what I’ve read from reviewers of the site, all their items cost at least $20 apiece if not more. One even got an iPod shuffle. And I like that it’s free shipping.

It’s not a new concept, but it’s an interesting one nevertheless. So, in for three!

I’m 100% positive you have at least heard the phrase Viral Marketing at least once in your life. Maybe about 25% certain that you know what it actually is. Viral Marketing, to be brief, is the tactic that Marketeers use to generate buzz via word-of-mouth-esque methods. Nowadays, this refers specifically to the intarwub. I’m sure you’ve seen at least one of the bigger name viral runs, like the oft-referred Subservient Chicken. Here, I’ll break it down further. You know what marketing is, so I won’t get into that, but let us now dissect the word “viral”. It means that it will spread out amongst the masses on its own; you don’t have to do anything to get it going besides just putting it out there. Such things include viral videos, which often act as a sort of gateway into Viral Marketing. Still don’t know what I’m talking about? How about the video of the water buffalo, crocodile, lion combat titled The Battle at Kruger?

That’s viral. People liked it, showed it to other people, who showed it to other people. Tada! Just like the disease viruses!

Okay. Now you know what Viral Marketing is. Here’s the problem: it doesn’t really have any return. Granted, the investment may be small, but you’re not getting anything in return besides maybe some laughs and bragging rights to how many hits you received. The claim is that you increase awareness and therefore increase sales, but, let’s be honest: there’s no correlation between the epidemic and the profit, which I suppose is where the similarities between viruses and marketing ends. Most deadly viral epidemics successfully kill, but marketing does not. Or maybe we just haven’t been trying hard enough.

So next time you hear your manager say “Hm, we should get on board this viral marketing thing”, laugh internally because a.) they most likely have no idea what it is, and b.) it does not really have any direct correlation to success regarding sales numbers as of yet. Now, this isn’t definite. It could change in the future where Viral Marketing ends up being a fantastic thing.

But please: for now, stop looking for Viral Marketing experts. There is no such beast. It’s really luck of the draw.

Oh. Here’s the article. Viral Marketing

(xkcd.com)

Marketers who remain in the general industry of advertising and marketing depend on one solitary adage when it comes to finding and keeping good jobs: market yourself first. It’s a fairly obvious concept particularly when it comes down to job hunting. But it goes beyond that somewhat. Marketers have to continuously maintain their image and reputation as it can weigh quite heavily towards your future in the industry. So that’s what we do: what we were trained to do. We find ways of applying a seemingly unrelated skill into a feature of ourselves. We advertise, we market, we brand ourselves. Above all: we talk. It’s my personal opinion that the majority of skilled marketers could get a job regardless of experience (within reason) if they are able to get to a face-to-face interview portion. The sheer volume of research we’ve done regarding personalities, consumer behavior, changing messages to match the audience, etc, gives us a distinct advantage when it comes to charm. However, there is a very challenging obstacle we must first face: Human Resources. HR has a lot of the same personality training and the like as us, which means that they can usually get an idea as to when someone’s being insincere. To put it in the words of Michael Scott (The Office): “I believe that the department is a breeding ground for monsters.”

Man, I’m feeling all over the place with this one. Anyway, speaking back to the image of marketers, I graduated recently. Naturally, the marketing department all sat together as preordained by the program. We were without a doubt the rowdiest and most difficult of the bunch. We’re the ones who bring in numerous beach balls and balloons, jeer at the ushers for confiscating them, generously passing around the albeit unsanitary communal water bottles, do the wave numerous times during the ceremony eventually getting multiple other departments to participate. We were always a troublesome band of brigands, but we always had fun.

Cheers, guys.

Now, I’m going to act under the assumption that you have no clue how the creatives department acts. Let me give you an example of the typical creatives/market research struggle goes. Typically, the intelligent approach when drafting an advertising campaign is to test the effectiveness of each creative copy with a sample market prior to releasing it to the public. Which makes sense. Now, every other division of marketing is fully on board with this as it is a logical and organized way to determine the effectiveness of a campaign before you dump several million dollars into it to later find out it is a complete failure. However, the creatives department, on average, loathes this process. Specifically when you tell them to change something. Anything as minute as “hey, most people can’t read this copy font, why don’t you change it to something more serif and legible” or “fuchsia and sea foam green do not mesh well for this particular insert” will drive a creatives member to the brink of utter madness. Now, I’m usually with you creative people when it comes down to subjectivity of art. I hated it when artistic classes graded you on creative aspects because it was a subjective field overall; however, this isn’t art class. It’s business. And such, it is vital to obtain a generally universal appeal (per target market, of course). Creatives will fight with a decision because it goes against their vision. The creatives department can consist of a sort of diva-istic population.

Now to complete my circuitous explanation. The Clios are based solely on creatives and what they like regarding the work of other creatives artistically. The Clios are not a measure of resulting sales or increases in brand awareness or changes of brand perception, etc. It’s just what they thought was pretty and artsy. Now, again, I pretty much don’t have an issue with this, except for the fact that they utterly adore throwing around the fact that a firm has won Clios when they are bidding for an account. No. Bad marketeers, bad! You should sell yourself by your results, not by your art awards.

Enough of that. So. Clios. This year there was a big applause for Microsoft’s Xbox division of marketing, which won three gold awards at the Clios. They’re admittedly interesting and entertaining if you’re within their realm of targeted demographics! I managed to find one example in Adweek’s article about the Clios which caught my eye with the oh so clever title “Halo Effect”, which naturally refers to Xbox’s quintessential star Halo series. Watch it, judge it by its artistic value, then reflect on the fact that they didn’t need to do a thousand of these different commercials to generate hype for a game which everyone was already pining for. Honestly, I could have made an equally effective campaign. It would have gone like this:

[black background, bold white text]

HEY.

YOU.

YEAH

HALO 3 IS OUT

JUST IN CASE YOU MISSED IT

IT IS OUT AT STORES

GO BUY IT

HALO 3: ON SALE NOW

Thank you. I’ll be accepting my Clio now.

http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2007/12/14/hear-voices-it-may-be-an-ad/

Simply put, I think it’s amazing. You can do a great number of things with this service ranging from “heat sensing” in which they mean that you can see a sort of heat trail of every time someone clicked somewhere. The more people that click on a spot, the hotter it gets on the scan. There’s also confetti, which essentially shows the various clicks but also provides you with information about the user themselves! That really opens the door to entirely new approaches of researching market base and comparing it with the way their mind is compartmentalized in regards to surfing your site specifically and adapting it to meet their most salient patterns!

AMAZING!

Here there be placeholders.